SOURCE TRANSCRIPT — NOT VERIFIED MEDICAL OR LEGAL FINDINGS
YouTube automatic captions; spelling and technical terms may be wrong. See the linked PBC article and claim table for the evidence review. Captured 18 September 2026. Full source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kprmb3CdUn4

0:01 I'd like to carry on reporting from the
0:03 conference in Sydney, Australia,
0:07 demanding a Royal Commission into the
0:10 disaster of the COVID management and
0:12 particularly the COVID vaccines. We've
0:15 already heard from Charlie Teio,
0:17 professor of neurosurgery, professor
0:18 Robert Clansancy, and myself on this who
0:22 all spoke at the conference, although
0:24 with me it was only online. Then we
0:26 heard from Angus Dal Gleas, a professor
0:29 of oncology and leading cancer doctor.
0:32 In fact, one of the world's leading
0:33 oncologists. And we've had him on the
0:35 program several times. And he talks
0:38 about people being mad, incompetent, or
0:40 negligent if they don't see the harms
0:41 done by COVID vaccines. Mad,
0:45 incompetent, or negligent. You might
0:47 want to add other things that are
0:48 possible there as well in the comments.
0:51 The link between mRNA vaccines and
0:53 cancer is now pretty well established
0:55 really. I mean, Professor Dles is
0:57 convinced that means I'm convinced. He
1:00 actually mentioned a heart tumor caused
1:02 by the vaccine. A heart tumor. I've
1:04 never seen a heart tumor in my entire
1:05 career. Very rare. And uh they also
1:08 found vaccine sequence in that heart
1:10 tumor when they looked at it. So this
1:12 this is really quite convincing
1:13 evidence. A lot of good evidence. And
1:16 professor Dlesia is one of the first to
1:18 point out some manufactured virus with a
1:21 positive charge that meant the uh the
1:24 spike protein could adhere to a lot of
1:27 receptors around the body as well as the
1:29 the A2 receptor. And he talks about 79%
1:33 human
1:35 homology. [snorts] So what he's saying
1:37 here is that 79% of the virus has got a
1:42 similar shape to human proteins, similar
1:46 homology to human proteins.
1:49 [snorts] And that means that the
1:50 antibodies that are produced to the
1:54 spike protein,
1:56 yes, they'll recognize the spike
1:58 protein. They're no good really because
1:59 that the the virus has already evolved
2:01 and moved on. But but they still um
2:04 produce antibodies to the spike protein
2:06 that you were injected with or or the
2:09 the recipe for the spike protein that
2:11 someone was injected with. But these
2:14 antibodies because of this similarity in
2:17 the shape of human tissues and the uh
2:19 the spike protein can latch onto human
2:21 tissues damaging human tissues.
2:25 and he's also convinced that the viruses
2:27 can go back into the genome. Now, this
2:30 is a particular problem because in the
2:32 genome we have some genes called enco
2:34 genes and they can stimulate cancers and
2:37 we have some called tumor suppressor
2:38 genes and they can damp cancers down.
2:42 So, if one of these sequences gets back
2:45 into your DNA into the genome, it could
2:48 stimulate an encoor gene or inhibit an
2:51 encoor gene. So both of those I think
2:54 you can see could potentially lead to
2:56 cancer. This is well as well as
2:57 inflammation and clotting and all the
2:59 other problems. Um I mean professor
3:02 Dowish rec recognizes an early stage you
3:04 can explain it physiological
3:06 physiologically reduced TE-C cell
3:08 response results in loss of cancer
3:10 control. His surgical colleagues have
3:14 reported similar things and he reports
3:16 on patients with multi multiple
3:17 primaries in the abdomen. In other
3:19 words, the cancer started in several
3:20 places all at the same time. This is all
3:22 really quite unusual, not in heard
3:24 unheard of, but very uncommon stuff.
3:26 Anyway, um do listen to him, let him
3:28 explain that. And after that, um I'm
3:30 going to uh let it run and we'll listen
3:32 to Dr. Melissa McCann, who's a very
3:34 courageous lady that I'd have
3:36 interviewed myself. Um
3:39 doctors warned not to speak,
3:42 doctors sent for re-education. It's it
3:44 sounds like something from the 1930s
3:47 in in Stalinist Russia or something.
3:51 persuasion and punishment of doctors and
3:52 then she talks about some terrible
3:54 examples and deaths after the covid
3:56 vaccines. So two excellent speakers uh
3:59 do give them a chance quite rapid
4:02 presentations because they didn't have
4:04 much time on the conference but if you
4:06 listen to Gus especially listen a couple
4:07 of times and uh you'll get more from it
4:11 the Melissa Macan one be particularly
4:13 interesting if you're interested in the
4:16 the Australia situation specifically but
4:18 with [snorts] applicability to
4:19 everything. So over to these great
4:21 speakers now.
4:24 [applause]
4:26 >> Thanks professor. It's now my pleasure
4:29 to introduce as our next witness
4:32 statement ameritus professor Angus Dal
4:36 Gleas.
4:37 [applause]
4:38 [music]
4:45 Thank you very much. Could I have the
4:47 first slide please?
4:51 waiting for it. I'm going to focus on
4:54 the the very strong link now between
4:56 messenger RNA vaccines and cancer which
4:59 has been vigorously denied uh that there
5:02 is no really good evidence. I'm going to
5:04 show you that there is a lot of good
5:06 evidence this um if you could just go go
5:09 back to this one. Yes. Now next slide
5:14 and next slide go straight to this one.
5:17 The se the virus was sequenced in early
5:20 2020 and it appeared uh in nature and it
5:25 was immediately obvious this virus was
5:27 basically manufactured. Next slide
5:29 please.
5:30 And uh we produced a paper we did uh
5:33 papers to the government. Everything
5:35 that this had come from the laboratory
5:37 and at the first paper we published
5:39 called Bac Biovac had to be disguised
5:43 because they didn't like the fact that
5:45 uh it was clearly evidently from the
5:47 laboratory because Fouchy had decided it
5:49 wasn't. Anyhow, I'm going to go on to
5:52 that in a minute. But with another
5:53 completely different group, we analyzed
5:56 the entire history of corona virus
5:58 vaccines. 20 years they've been trying
6:00 to make corona virus vaccines. Not only
6:03 has they never ever worked, but they
6:05 were highly dangerous in primates. Next
6:08 slide, please.
6:10 And I'm just showing you a picture that
6:12 basically proved that the inserts on
6:15 this uh virus uh gave it a very positive
6:19 charge that allowed it to bind to a lot
6:21 of other receptors other than the main
6:23 one, ACE. Next slide, please.
6:26 And the most important thing from this
6:29 was 79% of the protein had humanities
6:33 very strong to platelet factor 4 and to
6:36 uh myelin and even on the MH website
6:40 they have these are recognized side
6:43 effects of the vaccine but rare no next
6:46 slide please
6:49 now apart from the ability to enhance
6:51 inflammation and clotting I want to just
6:53 point out there was no specific IC uh
6:56 cancer signal at the time and this is
7:00 where I came in that when they started
7:02 the boosters I've been running a clinic
7:04 with melanoma patients for getting on
7:07 for two decades and I noticed that
7:10 patients were relapsing that had been
7:12 stable for years and I asked why and the
7:16 only thing they'd had in common was
7:18 they'd had booster vaccines from their
7:19 GP. I had told them to avoid it but the
7:22 GPS overruled me. Next slide please.
7:25 And the reason for this we felt was most
7:28 likely to be due to the fact that the
7:31 TE-C cell response was being interfered
7:33 with and we showed that to be a case but
7:36 Benetus Fentes and his colleagues showed
7:39 even better. They showed that the
7:41 booster vaccine boosted the antibodies
7:44 next slide which were useless because
7:47 they were after a virus which had
7:49 mutated and gone but reduced the TE-C
7:52 cell response. Next slide please.
7:56 And that the number of vaccinated
7:58 individuals demonstrated T- cell
8:00 activation despite base vaccines was
8:03 greatly reduced. Next slide please.
8:07 This was really quite incredible because
8:09 if you really reduce the TE-C cell
8:11 response, you're going to lose control
8:13 of cancers that are controlled by the
8:16 TE-C cell system. And I published this
8:19 in the BMJ
8:21 and online and it disappeared. But after
8:25 it had disappeared, obviously a lot of
8:27 people had read it because they
8:28 contacted me and they told me they what
8:31 they were seeing. Now James Royal, a
8:33 surgeon in the north of England
8:35 basically told me, next slide please,
8:38 that he had been seeing everything was
8:40 different and very interesting from
8:42 other people. He was seeing uh scans
8:45 with clots, thrombotic events, etc. and
8:48 bleeds. And then he was seeing new
8:51 cancers. Next slide, please. And he was
8:55 seeing cancers that one or three years
8:58 ago would have been completely curative,
9:00 but they were they were presenting stage
9:03 four instead of stage one. And some of
9:05 them with multiple sites, so there were
9:08 more than one primary in the abdomen.
9:10 Next slide, please.
9:13 So essentially we had something that was
9:15 called turbo cancer but even this has
9:18 been censored. We had to call them um
9:21 hyper progressive cancers. I'm going to
9:24 call them turbo cancers because it's a
9:26 new biological behavior. Very aggressive
9:28 rapid progression. They don't respond to
9:31 the majority of treatments even
9:33 ivormectin and forendol presenting with
9:36 really late stage and synchronous
9:39 cancers. So you might even get more than
9:42 one primary in a patient. They relapse
9:46 post treatment and remission and they're
9:47 very young and increased proportion and
9:50 inoperable. Next slide please.
9:53 And because of this
9:56 the hope accord was signed uh was put
9:59 forward and signed to ban these
10:01 messenger RNA vaccines because we
10:03 thought there was something else going
10:05 on. I just wanted to point this is
10:06 nearly four years ago. this such a
10:09 strong signal nothing happened. Next
10:11 slide please.
10:13 And what I want just to show you that as
10:15 the as the uh time went on the more
10:18 people were vaccinated the more likely
10:20 they were to get uh the COVID and the
10:22 more likely they were to get cardiac
10:24 conditions uh autoimmunity and cancer.
10:28 Next slide please. And there you have
10:30 the cancer. This is a US one and our
10:33 data in the UK is very similar. sudden
10:36 rise in death trends from um cancers in
10:39 young people between 15 and 44. You can
10:42 see that there's a sudden inflection.
10:45 This should have been a red card. Ban
10:46 these vaccines, ban them, ban the
10:48 technology. Next slide, please. And I
10:51 wanted to point out that uh even that
10:54 two years ago with Ian Bright Hope uh
10:56 and all the data we did policy
10:59 recommendations, I'm just giving you the
11:01 magnum uh the magnitude of the failure.
11:03 We wanted an immediate moratorium and a
11:05 royal commission in order to do this.
11:08 Nothing's been done. Next slide, please.
11:11 And the mass roll out uh we had said
11:14 there was no long-term adequate testing
11:16 and uh the suppression of adverse
11:18 outcomes. This is completely unethical.
11:21 Again, should be stopped. Next slide,
11:22 please.
11:24 And just back to turbo cancer. I'm going
11:26 to finish off with this because this is
11:28 real. But I want to show you the next
11:30 slide
11:31 because it is really quite incredible.
11:33 It's an anecdote. It's a doctor with
11:36 lymphoma. Look, on the 8th of September,
11:39 he had a PET scan to see how he was
11:41 going. On the 22nd of September, he had
11:44 to have a vaccine booster cuz he was at
11:46 risk and his nodes just swelled. So,
11:51 they repeated a PET scan. And you can
11:54 see by the 30th September, every single
11:57 one of his nodes has increased. and a
11:58 whole load more had appeared. We're
12:01 seeing this again and again and again.
12:04 And only today I was sent a report of
12:07 somebody who had a booster vaccine had a
12:11 uh tumor in his heart had to have the
12:14 tumor in the heart removed and the
12:15 vaccine sequence was in this tumor in
12:18 the heart as it has been in many others.
12:20 Next slide please. And I'm going to uh
12:24 just go on straight way to the next
12:26 slide because uh these people Angus and
12:30 I'll not me um basically put together
12:34 that it's not just the immune response
12:37 that's in charge of this. Is this a
12:39 complicated slide? There's lots of it
12:41 and I'm going to finish actually on this
12:43 slide even though we have added to this.
12:46 We found so many mechanisms but I'm just
12:48 going to sum it up. Apart from complete
12:51 perturbation suppression of the immune
12:54 system, these messenger RNA vaccines are
12:59 vax genes. They insert themselves into
13:03 your genome. They can go to every single
13:05 site and you cannot control them. I have
13:09 spoken to people who spent two decades
13:11 working on these genes and they've given
13:12 up. It's like hering cats. They insert
13:15 at random. They can insert next to an
13:18 gene. turn it on. And to my mind, it's
13:22 even more worrying is they can turn
13:24 insert near a suppressor gene and switch
13:27 it off. So that means that the potential
13:30 for lots of new cancers while we
13:32 continue to vaccinate with these things
13:35 is astronomical.
13:37 So I'm running out of time. So I'm
13:39 basically just going to stop there and
13:41 say the evidence is so overwhelming you
13:44 would have to be completely mad,
13:47 incompetent or negligent not to stop
13:49 this immediately. And that message we
13:52 gave in 22.
13:53 >> Thank you. [applause]
14:02 >> Well, thanks very much, Professor.
14:04 I I think there was a quote that
14:06 Professor Dale Leash said yesterday and
14:08 I might be getting it a bit wrong, but
14:10 he said, "I think I'd rather take my
14:12 chances standing next to a leaking
14:14 nuclear reactor." [laughter]
14:21 Witness statement number four from one
14:23 of our experts, Dr. Melissa McCann.
14:26 [applause]
14:33 Well, I joined the call for a Royal
14:35 Commission into CO because Australia's
14:37 pandemic management departed
14:38 dramatically from established
14:40 guidelines, from accepted practice and
14:42 legislative safeguards. And
14:43 extraordinary government action demands
14:45 extraordinary scrutiny. But a royal
14:48 commission will not compensate those
14:49 injured by co vaccines. And this is why
14:51 our class action also remains vital.
14:53 Now, our case is currently awaiting
14:55 judgment on an application for summary
14:56 dismissal, which is an attempt to end it
14:59 before we even reach trial. And the
15:01 respondents were essentially the leaders
15:02 of Australia's COVID vaccine program,
15:04 the head of the TGA, Secretary for
15:06 Health, Chief Medical Officer, and
15:08 Health Minister. And they say that their
15:10 actions were reasonable in an
15:11 unprecedented worldwide pandemic. But
15:14 pandemic management was not some novel
15:16 science. Australia already had a
15:19 nationally developed pandemic plan later
15:21 adopted for co in February of 2020 and
15:24 that plan said Australia was
15:25 wellprepared. It required a
15:28 proportionate response and stated that
15:30 it was likely the pandemic would be
15:31 managed entirely without a vaccine
15:34 instead relying upon hygiene PPE and
15:37 protection of those most at risk. Now,
15:39 the strong ethical framework required
15:42 that responses should be proportionate
15:43 to the risk, should uphold individual
15:46 liberty, and should minimize social
15:47 disruption. Compare that to what
15:50 followed. We were led to believe there
15:52 was no way to escape the pandemic unless
15:54 everyone was vaccinated. Proportionality
15:57 gave way to prolonged lockdowns,
15:59 curfews, and restrictions on healthy
16:01 people. Individual liberty gave way to
16:04 extraordinary intrusions upon
16:06 fundamental human rights, including
16:08 vaccine mandates. Now, doctors were
16:11 subjected to unprecedented regulatory
16:13 oversight. Restrictions were imposed on
16:15 prescribing and practitioners were
16:17 warned against expressing opinions
16:19 contrary to government vaccination
16:21 policy. I experienced this personally.
16:24 After speaking publicly and truthfully
16:27 about co vaccine side effects, I
16:29 received a caution from ARPA and the
16:31 medical board and was required to
16:32 undergo re-education on the co vaccines.
16:37 Now, when did the proper response to
16:39 legitimate scientific disagreement
16:41 become the pursuit and punishment of
16:43 those asking difficult questions?
16:46 Now the respondents also emphasized that
16:48 they were not responsible for vaccine
16:49 mandates and most mandates were indeed
16:52 enacted through state and territory
16:54 powers but Minister Hunt announced
16:56 mandatory vaccination for aged care
16:58 workers following national cabinet
16:59 agreement and itachi advice. The
17:02 Commonwealth Constitution limits federal
17:04 power concerning medical services
17:06 through its prohibition on civil
17:08 conscription. So the mandates were then
17:10 instead implemented through state and
17:12 territory powers. And to say afterwards
17:15 we did not mandate anything is an
17:17 extraordinary narrow description of what
17:19 occurred. And at daily press briefings
17:22 Australia were told Australians were
17:23 told that the virus would hunt down the
17:25 unvaccinated.
17:27 We were encouraged to pressure reluctant
17:29 family and friends to get the jab and
17:31 freedom became conditional upon
17:33 vaccination targets 80 85 90%. National
17:37 financial arrangements provided
17:39 Commonwealth funding to the states and
17:41 territories per vaccine dose delivered
17:44 and whatever justification is advanced
17:46 for this arrangement financial
17:48 incentives and public health coercion
17:50 are an unacceptable combination.
17:53 But there there was another fundamental
17:55 question under what legislative
17:58 authority was this enormous program
17:59 being funded? Australia already had a
18:02 statutory mechanism for government
18:04 funded vaccines and under section 9B of
18:07 the National Health Act. The minister
18:08 may provide designated vaccines with the
18:10 PBAC or pharmaceutical benefits advisory
18:13 committee performing a statutory role to
18:15 make a recommendation after considering
18:18 effectiveness and costs of the vaccines.
18:20 And the minister may not provide
18:22 vaccines without this PBAC
18:24 recommendation. But the COVID vaccine
18:26 sat entirely outside of this framework.
18:28 And then in September of 21, Parliament
18:31 enacted section 132G authorizing the
18:34 minister to provide co vaccines
18:36 including retrospectively covering
18:38 purchase arrangements entered before
18:40 this provision commenced and the power
18:42 expired on 30th of June 22. So what was
18:46 the legal basis for Commonwealth
18:47 expenditure after that date? And was it
18:50 proper to commence a multi-billion
18:52 dollar taxpayer taxpayer funded
18:54 pharmaceutical program and only later
18:56 legislate to authorize it, particularly
18:58 when it was outside of the express
19:00 requirements for the minister? Now 5
19:03 years later, co vaccines are
19:04 transitioning to the national
19:06 immunization program and in May of 26
19:08 were finally reviewed by the PBAC.
19:11 and look at the risk stratified
19:13 population targeted for commonwealth
19:15 funded vaccination following the PBAC
19:18 process recommendation is only for the
19:20 elderly at risk and imunocmpromised
19:24 imagine if this risk stratified approach
19:26 had governed the program from the
19:27 beginning as it ought to have consider
19:29 the difference for Ree a
19:31 physiootherapist in his 20s he developed
19:33 myocarditis endstage heart failure after
19:36 vaccination suffered multiple cardiac
19:38 arrests and eventually underwent heart
19:39 transplant and Caitlyn who was a third
19:43 healthy 23 year old woman. She developed
19:46 histologically demonstrated myocarditis
19:48 and died suddenly at work within weeks
19:50 of vaccination.
19:51 And Tony was a healthy man in his 40s.
19:53 He developed de debilitating fatigue and
19:56 cognitive dysfunction and can no longer
19:58 work or lead a normal life. There are
20:00 thousands of others and none of them
20:03 would have had the vaccines if this
20:04 program had been appropriately
20:06 constrained from the outset. These are
20:08 not statistics. These are human beings
20:10 whose lives were devastated.
20:13 Now, the respondents say they
20:14 acknowledge that vaccine side effects
20:16 occurred and they point to the
20:18 Commonwealth compensation scheme. I will
20:20 leave it to others to discuss this
20:22 limited, inadequate, and frankly
20:24 offensive scheme. The more important
20:26 question is what our regulatory system
20:28 was designed to do before this harm
20:30 occurred because we have confronted this
20:32 problem before. In 1961, theomide was
20:35 withdrawn after causing catastrophic
20:36 birth defects. Australia then had no
20:39 system for evaluating medicines for
20:41 safety before they went to market. And
20:43 the TJ itself says this tragedy
20:45 ultimately led to our modern regulatory
20:47 system. America largely escaped that
20:49 tragedy because one FDA regulator,
20:51 Francis Kelsey, refused to approve for
20:54 litomide. She did not have proof that it
20:56 caused birth defects, but she had
20:58 insufficient evidence that it was safe
21:00 and some concerning pre-approval data of
21:02 the animal studies. Precisely the same
21:04 as could be said of the co vaccines. And
21:07 this is really all our legal case is
21:08 arguing. Was safety and efficacy
21:10 adequately established for the purposes
21:12 for which these vaccines were approved
21:14 as required by section 25C of the
21:17 therapeutic goods act. So what did our
21:19 regulators know? By January of 21,
21:22 deaths following vaccination were being
21:23 reported amongst frail elderly people.
21:25 By March, serious and sometimes fatal
21:28 clotting syndromes had emerged following
21:30 Astroenica vaccination. Katie was a
21:33 healthy, vibrant actress in her 30s with
21:35 her life ahead of her. She died
21:37 following vaccine induced thrombosis.
21:39 Her family was left with their grief and
21:41 a little over $60,000 from the
21:43 compensation scheme. The safety report
21:45 subsequently contained a multitude of
21:47 serious events and signals in the
21:49 clinical trial group, including reported
21:51 confirmed cases of deaths due to
21:53 myocarditis and cardiac arrests in
21:55 children. Yet doctors and patients were
21:58 frequently reassured that any event not
22:00 accepted by the TGA was simply not a
22:03 vaccine side effect. And so these
22:05 experts tonight will examine the
22:07 science, safety data, and regulatory
22:09 approvals in more detail. But I would
22:11 like to leave you all with a simpler
22:13 question. Look at what these decision
22:15 makers knew and the powers that they
22:16 exercised. Look at the doctors who were
22:18 silenced and the people who were
22:20 coerced. And most importantly, look at
22:22 the people who were injured. and then
22:24 decide for yourself. Was this a
22:26 government acting reasonably,
22:28 proportionately, and consistently with
22:29 its duty to protect the health and
22:31 rights of Australians? Or does what
22:33 happened demand the most comprehensive
22:35 public inquiry that Australia can
22:37 undertake? That is why we need a royal
22:40 commission and why our case must be
22:41 heard. Please support our legal action
22:44 if you can. [applause]
22:48 >> Thanks, Dr. McCann. [applause] Well,