Canada's waking up to the reality that many of its citizens were injured by the COVID-19 vaccines. Many of those injured were members of the Canadian Armed Forces. The mandates, which were deemed to be illegal for the Canadian Armed Forces, have caused disarray and a loss of morale for many of its soldiers. I'm going to have the honor of being able to report live from the Allison Inquiry, September 8th to 11th, live on this channel. I'm re-releasing an episode that I did 3 years ago relating to the fact that a briefing note was released that forced all Canadian Armed Forces members to get the vaccine. This is relevant now because we need to know how we got to this point and what we need to do moving forward. So, in order to be able to watch and tune in live, make sure to like, subscribe, and turn on the bell notification for this channel. And make sure to go to the link in the description for the Allison Inquiry to get all the information so that you can be up to date on this very important Canadian event. The Canadian Armed Forces has really screwed the pooch on this one, and in my hand I'm holding a briefing note from a ATIP request that is freaking glowing. It's so radioactive. Stay tuned to what I'm talking about and how this relates to the COVID mandates that at then imposed on the Canadian Armed Forces and what it means for you long-term. All right, folks, I wanted to do this episode for a while, and I've been putting it off because I have a hard time wrapping my head around the level of corruption that is going on in our own government, and I wanted to do it justice, but I think my hand has been forced to put this out because of the events and the news reports that are coming out fast and furious. And I think it's only responsible to be doing it now. Part of me, during the whole COVID thing, I lost a part of myself during that. I went down a deep dark hole because going into COVID, I believed that the government had our best interests in mind. Coming out on the other side of the COVID crisis, I no longer have that belief. And that is something that has underpinned my entire life. It's why I joined the forces. It's why I went to war. I truly believed in whatever Canada represented. And unfortunately, I do not anymore. But on the bright side of that, I'm hoping that bringing things to light, exposing corruption where it needs to be exposed, and holding the standard that we once held of dignity, honor, and respect. During the COVID crisis, I started out timid. And this is not going to be so bad. It's 2 weeks. Why would the government want to go ahead and try and screw us over? Why would the government have somebody else's interests in mind? I was still naive to the fact that the best interests of its citizens are not its priority. And so, let's get right into what is going on now, and then we'll get into what I have in my hand right now, which makes this so troubling. Okay. So, the first thing that just came out was the The Epoch Times. The Epoch Times, and I'm sure this is going to be in some of the mainstream media, but it's definitely not going to be on page one, just FYI. Exclusive: Canadian military's COVID vaccine mandate violated charter rights, grievance review committee finds. This, in and of itself, is a massive bombshell. Here in Canada, if you're American and you're listening to this, the Charter of Rights is the highest law of the land. It's technically one step below God. The right of the individual was enshrined in law. The only issue is that if you break these, {quote} {unquote}, laws, it's not punishable criminally. So, one thing I respect about the Americans so much is that their Bill of Rights and the Constitution are documents you will die for. Here in Canada, ours weren't born out of blood. So, we have a different perspective of them. And therefore, they were able to be trounced upon and discarded as if they didn't matter. And this is so distressing because if we are not a country that abides by the rule of law, the highest law in the land, then what are we? And just to read a little bit of this report, "A military administrative tribunal has found the Canadian Armed Forces CAF COVID-19 vaccine mandate violated the charter rights of members who refused vaccination and said the policy was arbitrary in some aspects and overly broad. I conclude that the limitation of the grievor's right to liberty and security of the person by the Canadian Armed Forces vaccination policy is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice because the policy in some respects is arbitrary, overly broad, and disproportionate", wrote Nina Frid of the Military Grievances External Review Committee on May 30th decision. "Therefore, I conclude that the grievor's rights protected under section 7 were infringed." So, what this means is that he who commanded this committed a serious breach of the Charter of Rights. And it says so here. And who could that be that actually made this order that said, "Yes, let's go with the mandate?" Well, that's the Chief of Defence Staff, General Wayne Eyre. In this document, it makes it clear General Eyre issued an unlawful command. The remedy for this is that as Fred says, the CAF should declare that all CDS directives surrounding COVID-19 vaccination are invalid as well as rescind all administrative actions against members as a result of the directives. Some grievers also request apologies from the CDS for the infringement on their fundamental rights. It is left to the CDS to issue such an apology if he believes it is appropriate to do so. Okay. I guess the ball is in the CDS's court now. The CDS is not a stupid man. And I I know he knew that he was breaking the law because I have the documents right here. So, therefore, he willingly broke the law to initiate a punitive action against his own troops. I cannot imagine a worse situation for the Canadian Armed Forces where the highest military officer is going after its own members based on an illegal order. How do you generate trust and ensure morale from here on out? Yes, the title is COVID-19 vaccination requirements for the CAF. And the intent of this briefing note is to provide the CDS with blended advice from medical and then redacted for the CAF to meet the strategic objectives of reference A. The advice is guided by the best available scientific and medical evidence with consideration for force health protection operations and readiness levels. Para 4, assuming the COVID-19 vaccine intentions of the CAF population are reflective of Canadian society, upwards of 88% of CAF members may be willing to be vaccinated based on recent polling data. That said, it is important to be mindful of previous CAF vaccination campaigns, including H1N1 campaign campaign, which yielded lower vaccine uptake than expected. Options. During the course of the analysis, the following spectrum of options have been considered. A, no formal requirement for vaccination, which is the current approach. Vaccination as a requirement for deployment. Vaccination as a requirement for all expeditionary operations. Vaccination as a requirement driven by force readiness levels, and vaccination as a requirement to meet universality of service for all CAF members. Now, I highlighted this one, para six, medical. The global pursuit of achieving protection from COVID-19 and of mitigating the impacts of the disease through vaccination remains in its early stages. The extent of which these vaccines protect a recipient against serious illness from COVID-19 is un- known. They knew. But what were they telling us? No, no, no, no, it's safe and effective. They're going to stop the transmission. Yeah, you you'll be good to go. You just need to get it. So, that's funny. They knew it was unknown. Oh. But we were told that we were crazy if we said we don't know what the Without sufficient evidence that vaccines eliminate transmission of the virus, PHMs and quarantine protocols will continue to be required. Huh. And then para eight, vaccination is considered a medical intervention. It is a professional, legal, and ethical responsibility of health care providers to ensure that the process of informed consent is followed prior to any medical intervention. Informed consent means that the patient must voluntarily affirm their consent, must have had the capacity to consent, and that said consent was fully informed. It should be noted that informed consent is an ongoing process, wherein an individual elect to revoke their consent at any moment. All right, moving on to para 17. Options centered on mandatory vaccination of CAF members presents challenges in the public environment given ongoing litigation related to previous CAF requirements around mefloquine. Trust had been broken years ago in Afghanistan, in Bosnia, all the places in Africa where we were deployed and dudes got mefloquine poison. There's a massive class action lawsuit. So, when the government and the military is like, "Here, take this drug, troop." And you're like, "Wait, hold on a sec. All those guys that went crazy? How do I know that this isn't going to [ __ ] me up?" "Shut the [ __ ] up, take your medicine." I don't know about that. You said that before. I know that there's a problem with the other one. Maybe I don't want to take this one. Oh, boy, did you guys [ __ ] the bed again? What a surprise. I'm glad this was in here. Options sort of required vaccination to meet universality of service may still be perceived as mandatory given perceived career consequences for those who are hesitant or resistant. It's in the briefing note. You can't say, "Oh, well, I didn't know." You're coercing your troops to do something that they don't want. They've already said, "Yeah, I give my life to king, country for the duration of my time here. I'm serving my country." Respect the service. Don't coerce them to do anything outside of serving. Giving orders is one thing. Coercing them to sacrifice their own health from something that may not provide any benefit is a very, very troubling thing. So, therefore, yeah, if you had a little bit of hesitancy, you were absolutely right. And the government and the CAF knew. So, moving on. There was a bunch of options that were presented, which I think were pretty interesting. The options that were presented to General Eyre. There was option A, B, and C. Option A, a bunch of redacted stuff. This option would benefit from a pro-proactive COVID-19 vaccination outreach program led by the Canadian Forces Health, where CAF members would be required to attend information sessions and afforded the opportunity to refuse vaccination in a private setting. Okay. Option B, the requirement for COVID-19 vaccination for specific task locations and or missions would be established through an evidence-based risk assessment. The focus would include domestic and expeditionary operations, as well as out-of-country postings. With this option, CAF members who are not vaccinated against COVID-19 would be assessed as not meeting the requirement for a specific task appointment and or posting. The potential career and follow-on financial impact of these instances would increase members' willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. Though this could increase members' willingness to accept the vaccine, this could be perceived as coercion on some level. Or conversely, the CAF could be perceived as offering financial career incentives for those CAF members willing to accept vaccination. Yet, this approach would align with current practice related to other CAF medical interventions, such as vaccination against yellow fever for operations in select locations. Option C and D, this would be CAF members ordered to receive COVID-19 vaccinations based on requirement of all expeditionary or domestic operations or force readiness levels respectively. Option E, this would see CAF members ordered to receive COVID-19 vaccinations as a requirement for universality of service. Basically, if you don't get it, you're out. So, the recommendation was option B. So, currently, there's no supporting evidence to suggest that there is a need for all CAF members to be vaccinated. Therefore, implying that this is required clients with the universality of service is a bonafide occupational requirement at this time would be incorrect. Based on the limited data available on the authorized COVID-19 vaccines, it is recommended that there be no formal requirement for the vaccination of CAF members except in prospective circumstances where a member is to be deployed. So, the conclusion, in all circumstances the CAF COVID-19 immunization campaign needs to be guided by the best scientific and medical evidence justified by clear rationale, administered in accordance with best medical practices. To the extent to which the current available vaccines protect a recipient against serious illness from COVID-19 is currently unknown. And that unknown again. But, they were so sure they were safe and effective. Until more data and evidence is available that allows for the understanding of the effectiveness, reduction in in infectivity, and duration of immunity for each of the of available vaccines, public health ministers and quarantine protocols should continue even in a scenario with 100% CAF vaccine uptake, which that doesn't make any sense either, but at least some of the stuff in here is based in rationality. And I have the signature here approved by Lieutenant-General ACDS Wayne Eyre. Signed 10 March 21 by him, right here. Approved. Option B was the one that was approved. Okay? Option B was the one approved in March. Let that sink for a little bit. Option B was there's no supporting evidence to suggest that there needs to be a vaccine mandate. And implying that this is required for universality of service doesn't make any sense. So, let's just go with the current policy. We're doing pretty good. Let's keep on rolling. Well, that all changed in August with this briefing note. And from here, the CDS decided to go ahead and say, "Yeah, you know what? Everybody needs to be vaccinated." Everybody. Young, old, even if you have religious apprehensions, reasons for getting it, medical reasons, [ __ ] you, you're getting it. Or you're out. And that's, you know, the article that's here, it's, again, top general was warned military's COVID vaccine mandate was unnecessary, possibly illegal. I I put a little mark here just to kind of go over one of the the things that kind of blew me away in this one from August. Current epidemiological modeling suggests that there are lack strong evidence to require vaccination of the remaining percentage of unvaccinated CAF members for the purpose of force health protection, as there already exists a high level of protection afforded by CAF vaccine uptake rate. Additionally, medical ethical restrictions prevent CAF health services personnel from administering vaccines without the informed consent of the recipients. Remember we talked about informed consent? Coercion of CAF members to accept vaccination under threat of military discipline would not constitute informed consent. You done [ __ ] up, CDS. You done [ __ ] up. And this was published October 24th, 2022. This was in the National Post, mainstream media. So, this isn't news to me. I saw this. I was like, "Oh." What's news to me is that even in March, he was told, "Hey, don't go ahead with this." What changed from him to approve in March not to go ahead with a mandate to August to go ahead with the mandate that he knew was illegal. He knew it was illegal. So, we always need to come back to the question, key bono. So, I'm searching and maybe you should, too. Let's fire up the ATIP request machine. What document convinced the CDS or what meeting convinced the CDS to flip-flop? I can tell you right now, military officers, having been one, don't flip-flop. So, the CDS knew this was an unlawful order, but he carried it out anyways. Now, we need to find out why. Was What was his motivation to issue an unlawful order knowing that it was unlawful? That's where we have to get to the bottom of this. This is part of the corruption. This is part of the infiltration of terrible ideologies into the highest forms of government. I don't know what to do about this, but it needs to be exposed at some level. If you know the answer, please reach out to me. But, ultimately, those of you guys that have been suffering under this draconian totalitarian-like regime and their mandates over the last few years, the tide is turning. And thank you for holding the line and eating the [ __ ] because now the truth is going to come to light. The tide is turning and it's all because of you guys holding the line and sticking to your principles. And I honor you for that and I respect the [ __ ] out of you. So, that's it for me, guys. I hope you enjoyed this episode. There's going to be more to follow and I really hope that this sheds a lot of light. So, make sure to share this widely with your friends, especially those that are on the fence with this whole COVID-19 nonsense. We need to make sure that the truth comes out and not just surround it around left-wing, right-wing politics. It has nothing to do with that. The truth is the truth. It's It's not your truth. It's not my truth. It's the truth. So, make sure it gets shared widely and I hope to see you on the next one. Don't forget to subscribe and like the channel. All right, that's it for me. Train hard, fight easy. See you on the next one. Peace.