[0.00 --> 8.44] And I think there are very vulnerable adults getting sucked into this who need protection.
[8.44 --> 14.40] But beyond that, I do have an issue with gender medicine as a whole.
[14.40 --> 20.16] And that's simply from an ethical standpoint, because as I say in the report, I don't know
[20.16 --> 25.64] if you've, if you haven't made it all the way to the end of the report, there's a paragraph
[25.64 --> 28.92] in the conclusion where I say,
[28.92 --> 35.52] it would be criminal for a surgeon to sever the spinal cord of a person who identified
[35.52 --> 38.00] as a quadriplegic.
[38.00 --> 44.68] It would be criminal for a doctor to blind a sighted person who identified as blind.
[44.68 --> 50.72] And I think it's also just as criminal to amputate the genitals and remove the healthy breast
[50.72 --> 58.28] issue of people who identify as members of the opposite sex in that you are, you are taking
[58.28 --> 67.64] a healthy body and you are destroying it on the basis of a belief, the person's belief
[67.64 --> 70.04] that is not grounded in reality.
[70.04 --> 76.72] Now that's not to say that I think all medical transition needs to be banned because I'm
[76.72 --> 77.72] realistic.
[77.72 --> 84.12] In, honestly, in my own, if I could wave a magic wand and all of it would disappear,
[84.12 --> 88.16] I would, because I actually do not think that it helps people.
[88.16 --> 93.36] I've looked at the history of gender medicine, I've tracked it all the way and I can see that
[93.36 --> 98.72] there has never been any science to prove that this is safe and effective.